duimetrology.com

Purpose: To suggest that ATC/CFS scientists cannot provide any scientific opinion of the reliability of aging instruments out in the field without conducting an empirical study of instruments sampled from the field. To suggest that ATC/CFS scientists have no idea whether or not instruments in the field are performing in accordance with manufacturer's specifications. To identify the lack of any system of "verification" in Canada that instruments in the field are performing in

Sample cross-examination on the ATC and CFS Position Paper policy that every test stands on its own - that "reliability" has nothing to do with tests or data before or after the subject tests. Purposes of this cross-examination: To challenge the ATC hypothesis or policy that "each test stands on its own". To identify the hypothesis as faith or policy, not scientific opinion. To demand the wording of the hypothesis and the empirical testing methodology if it is a scientific op